Endir Briseno v. Robet A. Bonta

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 12, 20222:21-cv-09018California4,795 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:21-cv-09018-ODW-PD Document Filed 08/12/ Page 1 of Page ID #:717

O

6 7 United States District Court 8 Central District of California

9 10 ENDIR BRISENO, et al., Case № 2:21-cv-09018-ODW (PDx) 11 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ ROBERT A. BONTA, et al., MOTION TO DISMISS OR STAY [23] Defendants. 15 16 I. INTRODUCTION On November 17, 2021, Plaintiffs Endir Briseno, Neil Opdahl-Lopez, and 19 Rodney Wilson initiated this action individually and as a putative class against 20 California Attorney General Robert A. Bonta and the California Department of Justice 21 (“DOJ”) for violations of Plaintiffs’ constitutional rights arising from Plaintiffs’ 22 thwarted efforts to obtain certain Title 1 firearms. (Compl., ECF No. 1.) Defendants 23 move to dismiss Plaintiffs’ Complaint or stay the action. (Mot. Dismiss or Stay 24 (“Motion” or “Mot.”), ECF No. 23.) Defendants assert the Court should dismiss the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.