Henry C. Navarro v. James Hill

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 13, 20225:22-cv-00285California332 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 5:22-cv-00285-SB-PLA Document Filed 08/13/ Page 1 of Page ID #:1389

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EASTERN DIVISION 11 HENRY C. NAVARRO, ) No. ED CV 22-285-SB (PLA) ) Petitioner, ) ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE ) JUDGE’S REPORT AND v. ) RECOMMENDATION ) CONNIE GIPSON, Secretary CDCR, ) ) Respondent. ) ) 17 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the other records on file herein, the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Report), and the objections to the Report. In his objections, Petitioner concedes that the first two claims do not warrant relief. As for the third claim, the Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge that Petitioner is not entitled to habeas relief. Petitioner’s assertion that the state court’s denial of his Eighth Amendment claim was “objectively unreasonable” is unpersuasive, particularly in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.