Nathan Christensen v. Carter's Retail, Inc.
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 15, 20228:20-cv-00776California366 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
Case 8:20-cv-00776-JLS-KES Document Filed 08/15/ Page 1 of Page ID #:1493
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL
Case No. 8:20-cv-00776-JLS-KES Date: August 15, 2022 Title: Nathan Christensen v. Carter's Retail, Inc. et al
Present: Honorable JOSEPHINE L. STATON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
V.R. Vallery N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter
ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFF: ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANTS:
Not Present Not Present
PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS
CASE SHOULD NOT BE STAYED PENDING THE
CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT’S DECISION IN
ESTRADA V. ROYALTY CARPET MILLS, 511 P.3d 191 (CAL. 2022)
On June 30, 2022, the Ninth Circuit held in Hamilton v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 39 F.4th 575 (9th Cir. 2022) that it would be “inappropriate to allow federal courts to treat a freestanding manageability requirement as a dispositive consideration in PAGA cases” relying, in part, on the California Court of Appeal’s decision in Estrada v. Royalty Carpet Mills, Inc., 76 Cal.…