Fred G. v. Anthem Blue Cross Life and Health Insurance Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 10, 20222:22-cv-05710California3,607 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:22-cv-05710-FLA-GJS Document Filed 08/10/ Page 1 of Page ID #:142

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FRED G.,

Case No. 22-cv-01259-RS Plaintiff, 11 v. ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO tru o C tc irtsiD se ta tS d e a in ro fila C fo tc irtsiD n re 1 1 1 1 1 12 3 4 5 6

A INN ST UH

R IE nA M tN h iCB s EL a cU DC tiE O e of nMC e n aR P d vO A a en rS N rtS isY n. L g, I e vF t i E oal l .& a, t i oH nE sA oIL f. T tI hH n et

Ero md puT

lc oR t yio eA n eN

RS eF tiE reR m ent Income Security Act of 1974 tin Uh tro N (“ERISA”), Defendant Directors Guild of America—Producer Health Plan (the “Plan”) brings a motion to dismiss for improper venue, or in alternative to transfer the case to the Central District of California. The second defendant, Anthem Blue Cross Life & Health Insurance Company (“Anthem”), has not challenged venue. As explained below, venue is not proper in the Northern District of California as to the Plan, because none of the requirements of ERISA’s venue …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.