Gakik Akopyan v. Brian Kibler

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 18, 20222:21-cv-06696California485 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:21-cv-06696-RSWL-DFM Document Filed 08/18/ Page 1 of Page ID #:640

'O' JS-6 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 2:21-CV-06696-RSWL-DFM GAGIK AKOPYAN,

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS

Petitioner,

RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED

v. STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE[21] AND JUDGMENT

BRIAN KIBLER,

16 Respondent. 17 18 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (“Petition”) [1], records on file herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge [21]. Further, as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b)(3), the Court has engaged in de novo review of the portions of the Report and Recommendation to which Petitioner specifically has objected [22]. Petitioner argues for the first time in his Objections that he has shown good cause for a Rhines 1…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.