Joshua Forster v. Orange County

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 29, 20228:18-cv-01551California1,121 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 8:18-cv-01551-SB-JEM Document Filed 08/29/ Page 1 of Page ID #:985

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSHUA FORSTER, Case No. 8:18-cv-01551-SB-JEM

Plaintiff,

v. ORDER ADOPTING IN PART

REPORT AND

ORANGE COUNTY et al., RECOMMENDATION OF

MAGISTRATE JUDGE [DKT. NO.

Defendants. 75] AND GRANTING SUMMARY

JUDGMENT IN PART

After Magistrate Judge John McDermott determined that the record and arguments in their first motion for summary judgment were insufficient, Defendants Orange County and Deputies Amber Garcia, Kenneth Demauro, and Truc Nguyen filed a renewed motion for summary judgment on all of Plaintiff Joshua Forster’s claims. Dkt. No. 69. The Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation (R&R) suggesting that the renewed summary judgment motion should be denied in full, Dkt. No. 75, and notified the parties that any objections were due by August 15, 2022, Dkt. No. 76. That deadline has passed, and no objections have been filed. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the motion, opposition, reply, R&R, and the record.

Section…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.