Joshua Forster v. Orange County
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
Case 8:18-cv-01551-SB-JEM Document Filed 08/29/ Page 1 of Page ID #:985
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
JOSHUA FORSTER, Case No. 8:18-cv-01551-SB-JEM
Plaintiff,
v. ORDER ADOPTING IN PART
REPORT AND
ORANGE COUNTY et al., RECOMMENDATION OF
MAGISTRATE JUDGE [DKT. NO.
Defendants. 75] AND GRANTING SUMMARY
JUDGMENT IN PART
After Magistrate Judge John McDermott determined that the record and arguments in their first motion for summary judgment were insufficient, Defendants Orange County and Deputies Amber Garcia, Kenneth Demauro, and Truc Nguyen filed a renewed motion for summary judgment on all of Plaintiff Joshua Forster’s claims. Dkt. No. 69. The Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation (R&R) suggesting that the renewed summary judgment motion should be denied in full, Dkt. No. 75, and notified the parties that any objections were due by August 15, 2022, Dkt. No. 76. That deadline has passed, and no objections have been filed. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the motion, opposition, reply, R&R, and the record.