Edward Plummer, Jr v. County of Los Angeles

Case 2:20-cv-04568-SB-AGR Document Filed 08/30/ Page 1 of Page ID #:737

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EDWARD PLUMMER, JR., Case No. 2:20-cv-04568-SB-AGR

Plaintiff,

v. ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS

AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, et al., UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE

JUDGE

Defendants.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Second Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 41) (SAC), the records on file, the Report and Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg (Dkt. No. 50) (Report), the Objections (Dkt. No. 53) (Obj.), and the Reply (Dkt. No. 54). The Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Plaintiff has objected.

Plaintiff’s objections fall into three principal categories: (1) he claims to have suffered constitutional injury; (2) he seeks limited discovery to uncover additional allegations; and (3) he makes unsupported assumptions about Defendants’ knowledge of problems with his mother’s care. None of these objections can overcome the SAC’s deficiencies. A plaintiff must allege facts within the four corners of the…