Eugene Oak v. Michael C. Winter

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 30, 20222:22-cv-00517California2,060 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:22-cv-00517-MEMF-PD Document 252 Filed 08/30/ Page 1 of Page ID #:6052

O

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 Case No.: 2:22-cv- 00517-MEMF(PDx) EUGENE OAK,

Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

JURISIDICTION IS PROPER IN LIGHT OF

v. ROOKER-FELDMAN AND CLAIM

PRECLUSION PUR SUANT TO 28 U.S.C. §

1738 MICHAEL WINTER, et al., 15 Defendants.

On January 23, 2022, Plaintiff Eugene Oak (“Oak”), appearing pro se, filed a Complaint

against eighteen defendants alleging ten causes of action: (1) violation of the Due Process Clause under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments; (2) concealment pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2071; (3) obstruction of court order pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1509; (4) “fraud and swindles” in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1341; (5) violation of California Corporations Code § 9633; (6) “fraud and false statements” pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1001; (7)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.