Jacob Briseno v. James S. Hill
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 31, 20225:22-cv-01454California1,886 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
Case 5:22-cv-01454-FLA-RAO Document Filed 08/31/ Page 1 of Page ID #:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL
Case No.: EDCV 22-01454 FLA (RAO) Date: August 31, 2022 Title: Jacob Briseno v. James S. Hill, Warden
Present: The Honorable ROZELLA A. OLIVER, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Donnamarie Luengo N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder
Attorneys Present for Plaintiff(s): Attorneys Present for Defendant(s):
N/A N/A
Proceedings: (In Chambers) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS ACTION
SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED AS TIME BARRED AND
UNEXHAUSTED
On August 15, 2022,1 the Court received from Petitioner Jacob Briseno (“Petitioner”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, a Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody (“Petition”) in this Court. See Dkt. No. 1. Pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Proceedings, the Court has examined the Petition and determined that it appears to be untimely and unexhausted under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (“AEDPA”). A. …