Jacob Briseno v. James S. Hill

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 31, 20225:22-cv-01454California1,886 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 5:22-cv-01454-FLA-RAO Document Filed 08/31/ Page 1 of Page ID #:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No.: EDCV 22-01454 FLA (RAO) Date: August 31, 2022 Title: Jacob Briseno v. James S. Hill, Warden

Present: The Honorable ROZELLA A. OLIVER, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Donnamarie Luengo N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder

Attorneys Present for Plaintiff(s): Attorneys Present for Defendant(s):

N/A N/A

Proceedings: (In Chambers) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS ACTION

SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED AS TIME BARRED AND

UNEXHAUSTED

On August 15, 2022,1 the Court received from Petitioner Jacob Briseno (“Petitioner”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, a Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody (“Petition”) in this Court. See Dkt. No. 1. Pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Proceedings, the Court has examined the Petition and determined that it appears to be untimely and unexhausted under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (“AEDPA”). A. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.