Gary Abrams v. Blackburne and Sons Realty Capital Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 2, 20222:19-cv-06947California2,156 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND

The Court finds that plaintiffs’ motion is appropriate for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; C.D. Cal. L-R. 7-15. Accordingly, the matter is hereby taken under submission. On August 9, 2019, plaintiffs Gary Abrams, individually and as trustee of the Gary Abrams Living Trust Dated 4/28/2008; Jeffrey Aran; Stephen Debenedetto; and Preston Rohner (collectively, “plaintiffs’”), filed the complaint in this action against Blackburne and Sons Realty Capital Corporation; and George Blackburne, III (“the Blackburne defendants”); Angelica Gardner; Angela Vannucci; and Does through 10, inclusive (collectively, “defendants”). Dkt. 1. The procedural history of this case is known to the parties. This case involves a dispute between plaintiffs, who are individual investors in a hard money loan, and defendants, a commercial lending company and its agents, who brokered that loan between plaintiffs, other investors, and a group of borrowers. Id. In substance, plaintiffs allege that defendants committed fraud and violated other laws by making material misrepresentations in the …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.