United African-Asian Abilities Club v. C and S Shoreham LP

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 2, 20222:22-cv-06024California766 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:22-cv-06024-SB-E Document Filed 09/02/ Page 1 of Page ID #:102

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED AFRICAN-ASIAN Case No. 2:22-cv-06024-SB-E ABILITIES CLUB et al.,

Plaintiffs,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

v.

C & S SHOREHAM L.P. et al.,

Defendants.

Plaintiffs United African-Asian Abilities Club and its member James Lee, who has a vision disability and uses a device for mobility because he is unable to walk, filed this suit alleging that physical and communication barriers at Defendant’s property and website prevent Lee’s access, in violation of, inter alia, the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the Unruh Act. Dkt. No. 1.

Because Plaintiff’s Unruh Act claim is closely related to his ADA claim, the Court has authority to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act claim under 28 U.S.C. § 367(a). However, supplemental jurisdiction “is a doctrine of discretion, not of plaintiff’s right,” and district courts “can decline to exercise jurisdiction over pendent claims for a number of valid reasons.” City of Chi. v. Int’l Coll. of Surgeons, 522 U.S. 156, 172 (1997) (internal quotation marks and citations…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.