Dewayne Thompson v. Mario Nawaz

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 8, 20222:20-cv-10448California370 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:20-cv-10448-SVW-SK Document Filed 09/08/ Page 1 of Page ID #:784

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DEWAYNE THOMPSON, Case No. 2:20-cv-10448-SVW (SK)

Plaintiff, ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT v. AND RECOMMENDATION TO

GRANT DEFENDANTS’

MARIO NAWAZ et al., MOTIONS TO DISMISS Defendants. PLAINTIFF’S SECOND

AMENDED COMPLAINT

In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the attached Report and Recommendation (R&R) to grant Defendants’ motions to dismiss Plaintiff’s second amended complaint, any pertinent records as needed, and Plaintiff’s objections (ECF 79). The Court has reviewed de novo those identifiable portions of the R&R to which Plaintiff has timely and properly objected. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc). In doing so, the Court has declined to consider any arguments raised for the first time only in the objections. See United States v. Howell, 231 F.3d 615, 621-23 (9th Cir. 2000). It has also declined to consider objections that simply repeat arguments fully…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.