Chandler Ingram v. HamSquad, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 9, 20222:21-cv-09664California552 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:21-cv-09664-FWS-KS Document Filed 09/09/ Pagelof2 Page ID#:195

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES — GENERAL

Case No. CV 21-09664-FWS (KSx) Date September 9, 2022 Title Chandler Ingram v. HamSquad, Inc. et al

PRESENT: HONORABLE FRED W. SLAUGHTER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Melissa H. Kunig Not Reported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter

ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFF: ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANT:

None Present None Present

PROCEEDINGS: CHAMBERS) ORDER CONTINUING DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND SETTING MATTER FOR HEARING

On July 25, 2022, the court ordered Defendants to show cause (1) why Defendants’ counsel should not be stricken as attorney of record for lack of compliance with this court’s previous order and the court’s local rules, if an appropriate form was not filed by August 24, 2022; and (2) why Defendants’ Answer to the Complaint (Dkt. 20) should not be stricken if Defendants’ counsel was not in compliance with the court’s previous order by that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.