Iconic Images Ltd. v. Andrew L. Rosenblatt

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 8, 20222:22-cv-02390California244 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:22-cv-02390-SPG-JPR Document15 Filed 09/08/ Pagelof1 Page ID #:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Case No. = 2:22-cv-02390-SPG-JPR Date September 8, 2022 Title Iconic Images Ltd. v. Andrew L. Ronseblatt

Present: The Honorable SHERILYN PEACE GARNETT, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE Patricia Gomez Not applicable Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants:

Proceedings: [In Chambers] Order To Show Cause Re: Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution

Plaintiff(s) are ORDERED to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Link v. Wabash R. Co., 370 U.S. 626 (1962) (Court has inherent power to dismiss for lack of prosecution on its own motion). The below time period(s) has not been met. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff(s) to show cause, in writing, on or before September 22, 2022, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. This matter will stand submitted upon the filing of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.