Arovast Corporation v. Okaysou Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 12, 20228:22-cv-01037California4,663 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 8:22-cv-01037-MRW Document Filed 09/12/ Page1of15 Page ID #:127

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

AROVAST CORPORATION and ETEKCITY CORPORATION Case No. 8:22-cv-1037-MRW Plaintiffs, PROPOSED ES TIPULATED V. ROTECTIVE ORDER

OKAY SOU CORPORATION and (MRW VERSION 4/19) Defendant. Check if submitted without material modifications to MRW form 1. INTRODUCTION

M 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS

Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public 20 disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may * |! be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to |! enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this 23 |! Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.