Miguel Soto v. Baldemar R. Ancira

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 15, 20222:22-cv-06526California533 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:22-cv-06526-MWF-MRW Document Filed 09/15/ Page 1 of Page ID #:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. CV 22-6526 MWF (MRWx) Date: September 15, 2022 Title Miguel Soto v. Baldemar R. Ancira, et al.

Present: The Honorable: MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD, United States District Judge Rita Sanchez Not Reported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder

Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants: Not Present Not Present

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE SUPPLEMENTAL

JURISDICTION

The Complaint filed in this action asserts a claim for injunctive relief arising out of an alleged violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101-12213, a claim for damages pursuant to the Unruh Civil Rights Act (“Unruh Act”), Cal. Civ. Code §§ 51–53, and other state law claims alleged by Plaintiff. The sole basis for jurisdiction over the Unruh Act claim is supplemental jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(a). The Court, however, may decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction for the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.