Monrell D. Murphy v. R. Diaz

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 16, 20222:19-cv-05034California626 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:19-cv-05034-VBF-ADS Document Filed 09/16/ Page 1 of Page ID #:786

1 2 3 4 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MONRELL D. MURPHY, Case No. 2:19-cv-05034 VBF (ADS)

Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING R and R:

v. Granting Document #47 (Defendant’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings) R. DIAZ, et al., Directing Entry of Separate Judgment Defendants. Terminating Case (JS-6)

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Second Amended Civil Rights Complaint, Defendants’ Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge, and Plaintiff Monrell D. Murphy’s Objections to the Magistrate’s Report and Recommendation. The Court has reviewed de novo those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections were made. Plaintiff’s objections are overruled as explained below. Plaintiff argues the settlement agreement from Murphy v. Kern, Case No. 2:18-cv-10150 FLA (ADS), does not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.