Korttney Elliott v. 9800 Rush, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 21, 20222:22-cv-04184California1,073 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:22-cv-04184-FMO-GJS Document Filed 09/21/ Page 1 of Page ID #:

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 KORTTNEY ELLIOTT, ) Case No. CV 22-4184 FMO (GJSx) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT ) PREJUDICE 9800 RUSH, LLC, ) ) ) ) Defendant. ) ) 16 On July 5, 2022, the court issued its Standing Order Re: ADA Accessibility Cases (see Dkt. 10, Court’s Order of July 5, 2022), which ordered plaintiff to file a proof of service demonstrating service of the Complaint on all parties “within 93 days of the filing of the case absent a previously approved extension of time by the court.” (Id. at 2). The court admonished plaintiff that “failure to file the proof of service within 93 days after the filing of the case shall result in the dismissal of the action and/or the defendant that has not appeared in the case and for which plaintiff has not filed a proof of service.” (Id.) (citing…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.