Mercedes Torres v. County of Los Angeles

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 23, 20222:22-cv-04250California4,940 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:22-cv-04250-JFW-RAO Document Filed 09/23/ Page 1 of Page ID #:217

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11 MERCEDES TORRES, individually and as successor in interest, Case No. 2:22-cv-04250-JFW-RAOx THOMAS TORRES, J.T., a minor and T.T., a minor, through their Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver guardian ad litem WENDY FUNES.

Plaintiffs, [PROPOSED] STIPULATED

PROTECTIVE ORDER

vs. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, a [Stipulation filed concurrently municipal entity; LOS ANGELES herewith] SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, a municipal entity; SHERIFF ALEX

VILLANUEVA; CLAY PORLIER,

an individual; BRENDAN J. CORBETT, an individual; SERGIO ALOMA, an individual; and DOES 1 through 20 inclusive, 21 Defendants.

23 24 Having reviewed the Parties’ STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER, and GOOD CAUSE appearing therefore, the STIPULATION is hereby GRANTED as to the following: /// Case 2:22-cv-04250-JFW-RAO Document Filed 09/23/ Page 2 of Page ID #:218

1. A. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.