Andrew Harrison Kramer v. United States Government

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 27, 20222:20-cv-08234California2,094 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

INTRODUCTION

18 On September 4, 2020, Andrew Harrison Kramer (“Petitioner”), a prisoner in state 19 custody proceeding pro se, filed what was purported to be a petition for writ of habeas 20 corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (“Petition”). (Dkt. 1.) 21 On May 10, 2021, Petitioner filed a Motion for Return of Seized Property 22 (“Motion”). (Dkt. 7.) On July 9, 2021, the government filed an Opposition. (Dkt. 10.) On 23 August 17, 2021, Petitioner filed a “Response to Gov’s Opposition to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 24 Motion,” which the Court construed as a Reply. (Dkt. 14.) On August 20, 2021, the 25 government submitted on Petitioner’s behalf a document containing further arguments 26 regarding Petitioner’s claims, which the Court construes as a Supplemental Reply. (Dkt. 27 11.) 28 Case 2:20-cv-08234-RGK-JEM Document Filed 09/27/ Page2of7 Page |ID#:170

Petitioner does not challenge the fact or duration of his confinement or the 2|| execution of a federal sentence. Rather, he seeks (1) the return of personal property 3]| seized during the execution of federal search warrants, (2) unspecified post-conviction 4] discovery, and (3) a calculation by the Federal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.