Rudolfo Alcantar v. Raymond Madden

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 28, 20222:20-cv-09718California1,056 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:20-cv-09718-FWS-AS Document Filed 09/28/ Page 1 of Page ID #:6224

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – WESTERN DIVISION 10 RUDOLFO ALCANTAR, Case No. CV 20-09718-FWS(AS) Petitioner, ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, v. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED RAYMOND MADDEN, Warden, STATES MAGISTRTE JUDGE Respondent.

17 I. Introduction 19 Before the Court is a Petition for Writ Of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody [1] (“Petition”) filed by Petitioner Rudolfo Alcantar (“Petitioner”). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the records of the case, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. After having made a de novo determination of the portions of the Report and Recommendation to which Objections were directed, the Court concurs with and accepts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.