Rudy Latscha v. Ken Clark

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 20222:22-cv-02688California2,184 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:22-cv-02688-SVW-MAA Document Filed 09/30/ Page 1 of Page ID #:145

2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RUDY LATSCHA, Case No. 2:22-CV-02688-SVW-MAA

Petitioner, ORDER OF DISMISSAL v. KEN CLARK, Respondent.

16 I. SUMMARY OF PROCEEDINGS On April 19, 2022, Petitioner Rudy Latscha (“Petitioner”), a California state inmate proceeding pro se, filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus. (“Petition,” ECF No. 1.) The Petition alleged seven grounds for federal habeas relief. (Id. at 5– 7.1) However, Petitioner did not pay the $5 filing fee required for Section 2254 actions, nor did he submit a request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (See generally Pet.) On May 9, 2022, the Court issued an Order directing Petitioner to pay the required $5 filing fee or to submit a completed request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis by no later than June 9, 2022 (“Order”). (Order, ECF No. 3.) On July 25, 27 1 Pinpoint citations in this Order refer to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.