Douglas MacKenzie v. Brandon Price

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 20228:21-cv-01852California1,902 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 8:21-cv-01852-VBF-JC Document Filed 09/30/ Page 1 of Page ID #:618

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 DOUGLAS MACKENZIE, ) Case No. 8:21-cv-01852-VBF-JC ) Petitioner, ) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, ) CONCLUSIONS, AND v. ) RECOMMENDATIONS OF ) UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE ) JUDGE

BRANDON PRICE, )

) ) Respondent. ) _______________________________ ) 17 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (“Petition”) and supporting documents, the matters as to which the Court has taken judicial notice at petitioner’s request, the parties’ submissions in connection with respondent’s Motion to Dismiss and Request for Judicial Notice, and all of the records herein, including the May 5, 2022 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (“R&R”) and petitioner’s Objections to the R&R. The Court has further made a de…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.