Stacey Ann Foster v. General Paul Nakasone

Case 2:22-cv-05558-SVW-SK Document Filed 10/06/ Page 1 of Page ID #:324

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

STACEY ANN FOSTER, Case No. 2:22-cv-5558-SVW (SK)

Plaintiff,

FINAL ORDER TO SHOW

v. CAUSE

GENERAL PAUL NAKASONE et al., Defendants.

The Court has received Plaintiff’s response (ECF 7) to the order to show cause why she should not be declared a vexatious litigant (ECF 6). But that response not only fails to rebut the reasons why Plaintiff should be declared a vexatious litigant, it also only confirms the frivolousness of her— now seventh—complaint raising identical claims that have all been summarily dismissed. This order explains that Plaintiff now (as much as ever) meets all the criteria for vexatious litigant designation. See Ringgold- Lockhart v. Cnty. of Los Angeles, 761 F.3d 1057, 1062 (9th Cir. 2014). 1. Notice and Opportunity. Plaintiff has acknowledged receiving at least two orders notifying her that she may be declared a vexatious litigant if she continues to file the same complaint that has repeatedly been dismissed. (ECF 6 at 2, ECF 7; Case No. 2:22-cv-02321, ECF 5 at 3, ECF 8 at…