Johan Neerman v. Jeff Cates

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 7, 20222:22-cv-02751California752 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:22-cv-02751-PA-PVC Document Filed 10/07/ Pagelof2 Page ID #:554

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Case No. CV 22-2751 PA (PVCx) Date October 7, 2022 Title Johan Neerman, et al., v. Jeff Cates, et al.

Present: The Honorable © PERCY ANDERSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Kamilla Sali-Suleyman Not Reported N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter Tape No. Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants: None None Proceedings: IN CHAMBERS — COURT ORDER

On September 22, 2022, the Court issued two Orders to Show Cause Re: Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution (“Orders”). In the first Order (Dkt. 46), the Court required Plaintiffs to show cause, in writing, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution as to Defendants Matt Grunseich, Oicth Upfront LLC, Playsav Corporation, thecyberworld.org, bmswebsecurity.com, cybercertconsultants.com, 100bots.com, thetechdealer.com, theinternettycoon.com, ourtechfriend.com,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.