Charissa Keebaugh v. Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 13, 20222:22-cv-01272California4,904 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:22-cv-01272-MEMF-AGR Document Filed 10/13/ Page 1 of Page ID #:366

O 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No.: 2:22-cv-01272-MEMF (AGRx) CHARISSA KEEBAUGH, et al., Plaintiffs,

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT WARNER

v. BROS. ENTERTAINMENT

INC.’S MOTION TO COMPEL

ARBITRATION AND STAY PROCEEDINGS WARNER BROS. ENTERTAINMENT [ECF NO. 41]

INC.,

16 Defendant.

18 19 20 Before the Court is the Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings filed by Defendant Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. ECF No. 41. For the reasons provided below, the Court DENIES the Motion. 24 25 26 / / / / / /

1 Case 2:22-cv-01272-MEMF-AGR Document Filed 10/13/ Page 2 of Page ID #:367

I. Background A. Factual Background1 Defendant Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. (“Warner Bros.”) developed a mobile application game based upon the HBO television…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.