Iconic Images Ltd. v. Andrew L. Rosenblatt

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 13, 20222:22-cv-02390California267 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:22-cv-02390-SPG-JPR Document Filed 10/13/ Page1lof1 Page ID #:126

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Case No. = 2:22-cv-02390-SPG-JPR Date October 13, 2022

Title Iconic Images Ltd. v. Andrew L. Ronseblatt

Present: The Honorable SHERILYN PEACE GARNETT, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE Patricia Gomez Not applicable Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants:

Proceedings: [In Chambers] Order To Show Cause Re: Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution

Plaintiff(s) are ORDERED to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Link v. Wabash R. Co., 370 U.S. 626 (1962) (Court has inherent power to dismiss for lack of prosecution on its own motion). The below time period(s) has not been met. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff(s) to show cause, in writing, on or before October 28, 2022, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. This matter will stand submitted upon the filing of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.