Stephen C. Peet v. Armstrong International, Inc.

Case 2:22-cv-06672-MCS-MAR Document Filed 10/17/ Pagelof2 Page ID #:1992

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES — GENERAL

Case No. 22-cv-06672-MCS-MAR Date October 17, 2022 Title Stephen C. Peet v. Armstrong Int?’l, Inc., et al.

Present: The Honorable Mark C. Scarsi, United States District Judge

Stephen Montes Kerr —___————NotReported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter

Attorney(s) Present for Plaintiff(s): Attorney(s) Present for Defendant(s): None Present None Present

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE: MOTION FOR REMAND (ECF No. 45)

Plaintiff Stephen C. Peet filed a motion to remand. (Mot., ECF No. 45.) Plaintiff argues that Defendant Greene, Tweed & Co. is unable to prove that “it has a colorable federal-law based defense” satisfying 28 U.S.C. § 1442(a)(1). (Mem. 1, ECF No. 45-1.) The Court deems the motion appropriate for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); C.D. Cal. R. 7-15. The Court denies the motion for failure to comply with the prefiling conference requirement of Local Rule 7-3.…