Bell Semiconductor, LLC v. Omnivision Technologies, Inc.
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 19, 20228:22-cv-01840California503 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
Case 8:22-cv-01840-KES Document Filed 10/19/ Page 1 of Page ID #:113
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL
Case Nos. 8:22-cv-01823-KES and 8:22-cv-01840-KES Date: October 19, 2022
Titles: Bell Semiconductor, LLC v. Western Digital Technologies, Inc. Bell Semiconductor, LLC v. Omnivision Technologies, Inc.
PRESENT:
THE HONORABLE KAREN E. SCOTT, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Jazmin Dorado Not Present Courtroom Clerk Court Reporter
ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR
PLAINTIFF: DEFENDANTS:
None Present None Present
PROCEEDINGS (IN CHAMBERS): Order TO SHOW CAUSE WHY
APPLICATIONS OF NON-RESIDENT
ATTORNEYS TO APPEAR PRO HAC
VICE SHOULD NOT BE DENIED
UNDER LOCAL RULE 83-2.1.3.2(c).
This Court orders Plaintiff Bell Semiconductor, LLC (“Bell Semiconductor”) to show cause why Alexandra Easley, Richard Kamprath, Ashley Moore, and David Sochia’s Applications to Appear Pro Hac Vice should not be denied under Local Rule 83-2.1.3.2(c). On October 14, 2022, those four attorneys applied for permission to appear pro hac vice.…