Bell Semiconductor, LLC v. Omnivision Technologies, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 19, 20228:22-cv-01840California503 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 8:22-cv-01840-KES Document Filed 10/19/ Page 1 of Page ID #:113

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case Nos. 8:22-cv-01823-KES and 8:22-cv-01840-KES Date: October 19, 2022

Titles: Bell Semiconductor, LLC v. Western Digital Technologies, Inc. Bell Semiconductor, LLC v. Omnivision Technologies, Inc.

PRESENT:

THE HONORABLE KAREN E. SCOTT, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Jazmin Dorado Not Present Courtroom Clerk Court Reporter

ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR

PLAINTIFF: DEFENDANTS:

None Present None Present

PROCEEDINGS (IN CHAMBERS): Order TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

APPLICATIONS OF NON-RESIDENT

ATTORNEYS TO APPEAR PRO HAC

VICE SHOULD NOT BE DENIED

UNDER LOCAL RULE 83-2.1.3.2(c).

This Court orders Plaintiff Bell Semiconductor, LLC (“Bell Semiconductor”) to show cause why Alexandra Easley, Richard Kamprath, Ashley Moore, and David Sochia’s Applications to Appear Pro Hac Vice should not be denied under Local Rule 83-2.1.3.2(c). On October 14, 2022, those four attorneys applied for permission to appear pro hac vice.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.