Korttney Elliott v. 2205 W. Whittier LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 19, 20222:22-cv-07490California748 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:22-cv-07490-SB-MAR Document Filed 10/19/ Page 1 of Page ID #:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KORTTNEY ELLIOTT, Case No. 2:22-cv-07490-SB-MAR

Plaintiff,

v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

2205 W. WHITTIER LLC et al.,

Defendants.

Plaintiff Korttney Elliott, who suffers from hemiplegia and requires the use of a wheelchair, filed this suit alleging that Defendant’s business does not maintain parking facilities accessible to people with disabilities, in violation of, inter alia, the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the Unruh Act. Dkt. No. 1.

Because Plaintiff’s Unruh Act claim is closely related to her ADA claim, the Court has authority to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act claim under 28 U.S.C. § 367(a). However, supplemental jurisdiction “is a doctrine of discretion, not of plaintiff’s right,” and district courts “can decline to exercise jurisdiction over pendent claims for a number of valid reasons.” City of Chi. v. Int’l Coll. of Surgeons, 522 U.S. 156, 172 (1997) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted). This discretion is codified in Section…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.