Austin Arnoldini v. Centene Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 19, 20222:22-cv-03328California739 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:22-cv-03328-FMO-KS Document Filed 10/19/ Page 1 of Page ID #:191

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 AUSTIN ARNOLDINI, ) NO. CV 22-3328 FMO (KSx) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT ) PREJUDICE CENTINE CORPORATION, ) ) Defendant. ) ) 15 Plaintiff filed his complaint on May 17, 2022 (Dkt. 1). By order dated August 26, 2022, plaintiff was ordered to show cause, on or before September 6, 2022, why this action should not be dismissed for plaintiff’s failure to complete service of the summons and complaint as required by Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (See Dkt. 9, Court’s Order of August 26, 2022). The order to show cause stated that it would stand submitted upon the filing of a proof of service on defendant or defendant’s answer. (See id.). The OSC admonished plaintiff that “[f]ailure to file a timely response to th[e] Order to Show Cause shall result in the action or the above…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.