Marquise Bailey v. James M. Berardini

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 24, 20225:22-cv-01800California478 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 5:22-cv-01800-SSS-SHK Document Filed 10/24/ Page 1 of Page ID #:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES—

GENERAL

Case 5:22-cv-01800-SSS-SHKx Date October 24, 2022 No. Title Marquise Bailey v. James M. Berardini

Present: The

SUNSHINE S. SYKES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Honorable

Irene Vazquez Not Reported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter

Attorney(s) Present for Plaintiff(s): Attorney(s) Present for Defendant(s): None Present None Present

Proceedings: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE COURT SHOULD

NOT DENY SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION

On October 12, 2022, Plaintiff Marquise Bailey filed her Complaint asserting a claim for injunctive relief arising out of an alleged violation of the American with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. §§§ 12182(a), 121282(b)(A)(i)–(iv), and 1283(a)(2); a claim for damages pursuant to California’s Unruh Civil Rights Acts (“Unruh Act”), Cal. Civ. Code § 52; a claim damages pursuant to California’s Disabled Persons Act, Cal. Civ. Code §§ 54.1(a)–(d); a claim for damages pursuant to California Health & Safety Code…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.