Jose Pena v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 24, 20228:22-cv-01222California1,747 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 8:22-cv-01222-SSS-ADS Document Filed 10/24/ Page 1 of Page ID #:286

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSE PENA, individually, and on Case No. 8:22-cv-01222-SSS-ADSx behalf of all other similarly situated consumers,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

13 Plaintiff, MOTION TO REMAND CASE TO STATE COURT [DKT. 22] v.

EXPERIAN INFORMATION

16 SOLUTIONS, INC., and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive,

18 Defendants. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case 8:22-cv-01222-SSS-ADS Document Filed 10/24/ Page 2 of Page ID #:287

Before the Court is Plaintiff Jose Pena’s Motion to Remand Case to State Court. [Dkt. 22]. The Court has reviewed the Parties’ submissions and, for the reasons below, DENIES Plaintiff’s motion. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff filed this action on behalf of a putative class against Experian Information Solutions, Inc. (“Experian”) in Orange County Superior Court alleging Experian willfully violated the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1681 et seq. (the “FCRA”)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.