George Urquidez v. FCA US LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 25, 20225:22-cv-00973California402 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 5:22-cv-00973-JGB-KK Document Filed 10/25/ Pagelof2 Page ID #:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL

CaseNo. EDCV 22-973 JGB (KKx) Date October 25, 2022 Title George Urquides, et al. v. Ford Motor Company, et al.

Present: The Honorable JESUS G. BERNAL, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

___MAYNORGALVEZ _____NotReported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter

Attorney(s) Present for Plaintiff(s): Attorney(s) Present for Defendant(s): None Present None Present

Proceedings: Order to Show Cause (INCHAMBERS)

On June 10, 2022, Defendant Ford Motor Company removed the action. (“Notice of Removal,” Dkt. No. 1.) Since then, there has been virtually no activity in this case. Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure grants the Court authority to sua sponte dismiss actions for failure to prosecute or failure to comply with court orders. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Wolff v. California, 318 F.R.D. 627, 630 (C.D. Cal. 2016). A plaintiff must prosecute her case with “reasonable diligence” to avoid dismissal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.