Siobahn Carroll v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
Case 2:21-cv-09217-FMO-RAO Document Filed 10/31/ Page 1 of Page ID #:662
1 2 3 4 5 6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9 10 SIOBAHN CARROLL and ALAN Case No. 2:21-cv-09217-FMO-RAO 11 LUKEN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, STIPULATED PROTECTIVE
ORDER1
13 Plaintiffs, v.
PROGRESSIVE SELECT
INSURANCE COMPANY, an Ohio Corporation, UNITED FINANCIAL 17 CASUALTY COMPANY, an Ohio Corporation, 19 Defendants. 20 1. A. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this 27 1 This Stipulated Protective Order is substantially based on the model protective 28 order provided under Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver’s Procedures.