Luis Pacheco v. Costco Wholesale Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 2, 20225:22-cv-01405California6,393 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. BACKGROUND

On March 29, 2022, Plaintiff filed a complaint against Defendants Costco Wholesale Corporation (“Costco” or “Defendant”), Chris Marmon, Russ Flores, Marilee Alamilla, and Does 1-100 (collectively, “Defendants”) in the San Bernardino Superior Court. (Motion Ex. 1, “Complaint.”) Plaintiff served Defendant Costco on May 11, 2022. (Declaration of Derek T. Tran (“Tran Decl.”) ¶ 3; Motion Ex. 2, Proof of Service.) The Complaint alleges ten causes of action: (1) discrimination on the basis of sex/gender in violation of Cal. Govt. Code § 12940(a);

1 On October 27, 2022, Defendant filed a request for remote appearance at the November 7, 2022 hearing on the Motion. (Dkt. No. 18.) Because the Court vacates the hearing on the Motion, it DENIES AS MOOT the request. Page 1 of CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL Initials of Deputy Clerk mg Case 5:22-cv-01405-JGB-SHK Document Filed 11/02/ Page 2 of Page ID #:457

(2) retaliation in violation of Cal. Govt. Code § 12490(h); (3) retaliation for whistleblowing in violation of Cal. Lab. Code. § 1102.5; (4) negligent supervision, hiring and retention (California common law); (5) wrongful termination of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.