Raizel Blumberger v. California Hospital Medical Center

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 2, 20222:22-cv-06066California3,232 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:22-cv-06066-FLA-JC Document Filed 11/02/ Page 1 of Page ID #:472

JS-6 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAIZEL BLUMBERGER, Case No. 2:22-cv-06066-FLA (JCx) Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT

v. IAN B. TILLEY, M.D.’S MOTION TO AMEND FILING DATE [DKT. 13]

AND GRANTING PLAINTIFF

CALIFORNIA HOSPITAL MEDICAL

RAIZEL BLUMBERGER AND CENTER, et al., MOVANT THE UNITED STATES OF Defendants. AMERICA’S MOTIONS TO REMAND [DKTS. 20, 23] 18

20 RULING Before the court are three motions: (1) Defendant Ian B. Tilley, M.D.’s (“Tilley”) Motion to Amend the Filing Date of Notice of Removal Nunc Pro Tunc (“Motion to Amend”) (Dkt. 13); (2) Movant the United States of America’s (“Government”) Motion to Remand (Dkt. 20); and (3) Plaintiff Raizel…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.