Leslie Ann Armstrong v. Andrew Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 7, 20222:21-cv-02727California1,158 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. BACKGROUND

22 On March 30, 2021, Plaintiff filed a complaint in this Court challenging the 23 Commissioner’s decision to deny her application for Supplemental Security Income 24 (“SSI”) benefits and Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”). See generally Dkt. No.

1 Plaintiff’s name is partially redacted in compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c)(2)(B) and the recommendation of the Committee on Court Administration and Case Management of the Judicial Conference of the United States. Case 2:21-cv-02727-RAO Document Filed 11/07/ Page 2 of Page ID #:179

1. On August 9, 2021, based on the parties’ Joint Stipulation to Voluntary Remand Pursuant to Sentence Four of U.S.C. § 405(g), the Court issued an order remanding the matter to the Social Security Administration. Dkt. No. 17-18. Judgment was entered the same day. Dkt. No. 19. The Court later entered an order granting the parties’ Stipulation for Award of Attorney’s Fees Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). Dkt. No. 20. Pursuant to that order, the Court awarded Counsel $1,000.00 8 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.