Onni South Hill, LP v. Lance Jackson
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
Case 2:22-cv-07600-RGK-JC Document Filed 11/08/ Page 1 of Page ID #:42 cc: Superior Court of CA, County of
JS6
Los Angeles, Case No. 22STUD04711 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4 Onni South Hill, LP
CASE NUMBER:
5 2:22-cv-07600-RGK-JCx Plaintiff(s), v. Lance Jackson, et al.
ORDER REMANDING CASE TO
STATE COURT 10 Defendant(s). 11 The Court sua sponte REMANDS this action to the California Superior Court for the 13 County of L o s A n g e l e s for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, as set forth below. “The right of removal is entirely a creature of statute and ‘a suit commenced in a state 15 court must remain there until cause is shown for its transfer under some act of Congress.’” 16 Syngenta Crop Prot., Inc. v. Henson, 537 U.S. 28, 32 (2002) (quoting Great N. Ry. Co. v. 17 Alexander, 246 U.S. 276, 280 (1918)). Generally, where Congress has acted to create a right of 18 removal, those statutes are strictly construed against removal jurisdiction. Id.; Nevada v.…