Korttney Elliott v. Maria P. Landazuri

Case 2:22-cv-08184-SB-AGR Document Filed 11/10/ Page 1 of Page ID #:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KORTTNEY ELLIOTT, Case No. 2:22-cv-08184-SB-AGR

Plaintiff,

v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

MARIA P. LANDAZURI et al.,

Defendants.

Plaintiff Korttney Elliott, who suffers from hemiplegia and requires the use of a wheelchair, filed this suit alleging that Defendant’s business is not accessible to people with disabilities, in violation of, inter alia, the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the Unruh Act. Dkt. No. 1.

Because Plaintiff’s Unruh Act claim is closely related to her ADA claim, the Court has authority to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act claim under 28 U.S.C. § 367(a). However, supplemental jurisdiction “is a doctrine of discretion, not of plaintiff’s right,” and district courts “can decline to exercise jurisdiction over pendent claims for a number of valid reasons.” City of Chi. v. Int’l Coll. of Surgeons, 522 U.S. 156, 172 (1997) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted). This discretion is codified in Section 1367(c):

The district courts may…