Multiple Energy Technologies, LLC v. Seth Casden

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 16, 20222:21-cv-01149California3,793 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:21-cv-01149-ODW-RAO Document 104 Filed 11/16/ Page 1 of Page ID #:2574

O

2 3 4 5 6

United States District Court Central District of California

11 MULTIPLE ENERGY Case № 2:21-cv-01149-ODW (RAOx)

TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,

12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR 13 v. RECONSIDERATION [62][103] AND MOTION TO REOPEN DISCOVERY 15 SETH CASDEN, [93]

Defendant.

17 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Multiple Energy Technologies (“MET”) moves for reconsideration of 20 the Court’s order denying MET’s ex parte application to extend the expert discovery 21 deadline. (Mot. Recons. (“Motion for Reconsideration”), ECF No. 62.) The Motion 22 for Reconsideration is fully briefed. (Opp’n Mot. Recons., ECF Nos. 63, 64; Reply 23 ISO Mot. Recons., ECF No. 65.) MET also moves to reopen discovery for the limited purpose of permitting: 25 (1) the parties to conduct expert discovery; (2) MET to compel certain documents 26 from Defendant Seth Casden set forth in MET’s previously denied…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.