Nataly Morales v. Amer Sports Canada Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 18, 20222:21-cv-07873California457 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:21-cv-07873-SSS-SK Document Filed 11/18/ Page 1 of Page ID #:223

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES—

GENERAL

Case No. 2:21-cv-07873-SSS-SKx Date November 18, 2022 Title Nataly Morales v. Amer Sports Canada, Inc., et al.

Present: The Honorable SUNSHINE S. SYKES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Irene Vazquez Not Reported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter

Attorney(s) Present for Plaintiff(s): Attorney(s) Present for Defendant(s): None Present None Present

Proceedings: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE (IN CHAMBERS) The Complaint filed in this action asserts a claim for injunctive relief based on an alleged violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12181, and a claim for damages pursuant to California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act (“Unruh Act”), Cal. Civ. Code § 51 et seq. The Court possesses only supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act claim. See 28 U.S.C. § 1367(a). The supplemental jurisdiction statute “reflects the understanding that, when deciding whether to exercise supplemental jurisdiction, ‘a federal court should…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.