Jessenia Gonzalez De Vidal v. Ford Motor Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 21, 20222:21-cv-07115California3,303 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:21-cv-07115-FLA-JPR Document Filed 11/21/ Page 1 of Page ID #:458

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JESSENIA GONZALEZ DE VIDAL, et Case No. 2:21-cv-07115-FLA (JPRx) al., 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO REMAND [DKT. 11] v. 14 15 FORD MOTOR COMPANY, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 RULING Before the court is Plaintiffs Jessenia Gonzales De Vidal and Billy H Vidal’s (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) Motion to Remand (“Motion”). Dkt. 11 (“Mot.”). Defendant Ford Motor Company (“Defendant” or “Ford”) filed an Opposition, and Plaintiffs filed a Reply. Dkts. 15 (“Opp’n”), 16 (“Reply”). On November 30, 2021, the court found this matter appropriate for resolution without oral argument and vacated the hearing set for December 3, 2021. Dkt. 18; see Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); Local Rule 7-15. For the reasons stated herein, the court DENIES Plaintiffs’ Motion. / / /

1 Case 2:21-cv-07115-FLA-JPR Document Filed 11/21/ Page 2 of 10 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.