Michael Egan v. Lonza Biologics

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 22, 20222:22-cv-05335California624 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:22-cv-05335-DMG-PD Document Filed 11/22/ Page 1 of Page ID #:331

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL

Case No. CV 22-5335-DMG (PDx) Date November 22, 2022

Title Michael Egan v. Lonza Biologics, et al. Page 1 of

Present: The Honorable DOLLY M. GEE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

KANE TIEN NOT REPORTED

Deputy Clerk Court Reporter

Attorneys Present for Plaintiff(s) Attorneys Present for Defendant(s) None Present None Present

Proceedings: IN CHAMBERS—ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY DEFENDANTS’

MOTION TO DISMISS SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED FOR LACK OF

OPPOSITION

On November 1, 2022, Defendants Lonza Biologics and Jeffrey Rosenbloom filed a motion to dismiss (“MTD”) pro se Plaintiff Michael Egan’s Complaint. [Doc. # 27.] The MTD seeks dismissal under Rule 12(b)(2) for lack of personal jurisdiction over Jeffrey Rosenbloom, Rule 12(b)(3) for improper venue, and Rule 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim. MTD at 2. The matter is currently set for hearing on December 9, 2022. See MTD. Plaintiff’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.