Michael Egan v. Lonza Biologics
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 22, 20222:22-cv-05335California624 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
Case 2:22-cv-05335-DMG-PD Document Filed 11/22/ Page 1 of Page ID #:331
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL
Case No. CV 22-5335-DMG (PDx) Date November 22, 2022
Title Michael Egan v. Lonza Biologics, et al. Page 1 of
Present: The Honorable DOLLY M. GEE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
KANE TIEN NOT REPORTED
Deputy Clerk Court Reporter
Attorneys Present for Plaintiff(s) Attorneys Present for Defendant(s) None Present None Present
Proceedings: IN CHAMBERS—ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY DEFENDANTS’
MOTION TO DISMISS SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED FOR LACK OF
OPPOSITION
On November 1, 2022, Defendants Lonza Biologics and Jeffrey Rosenbloom filed a motion to dismiss (“MTD”) pro se Plaintiff Michael Egan’s Complaint. [Doc. # 27.] The MTD seeks dismissal under Rule 12(b)(2) for lack of personal jurisdiction over Jeffrey Rosenbloom, Rule 12(b)(3) for improper venue, and Rule 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim. MTD at 2. The matter is currently set for hearing on December 9, 2022. See MTD. Plaintiff’s…