Maranda

INTRODUCTION

14 On November 10, 2022, Harold C. Lee (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, filed 15 the instant Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”). ECF Docket No. (“Dkt.”) 11. For 16 the reasons discussed below, the Court dismisses the SAC with leave to amend. 17 If Plaintiff desires to pursue this action, he is ORDERED to respond by 18 no later than December 23, 2022, by choosing one of the three (3) options 19 discussed in Part V, below. Further, Plaintiff is admonished that, if he fails to 20 timely respond, the Court will recommend that this action be dismissed without 21 further leave to amend and with prejudice for failure to state a claim and follow the 22 Court’s orders. 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// Case 2:22-cv-07097-FWS-MAR Document Filed 11/22/ Page 2 of Page ID #:

II. BACKGROUND A. PROCEDURAL HISTORY On March 10, 2022, Plaintiff constructively filed1 a Complaint in the Southern District of California, bringing claims pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“Section 1983”) against Defendants located in both the Central and Southern Districts of California. Dkt. 1 at…