Skyler Bishil v. LBF Travel Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 28, 20222:22-cv-06059California2,244 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:22-cv-06059-MEMF-AS Document Filed 11/28/ Page 1 of Page ID #:226

JS-6, O 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No.: 2:22-cv-06059-MEMF-ASx SKYLER BISHIL,

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

REMAND [ECF NO. 9]

v.

LBF TRAVEL INC., et al., Defendants. 16

18 19 Before the Court is the Motion to Remand filed by Plaintiff Skyler Bishil. ECF No. 9. For the reasons stated herein, the Court hereby GRANTS the Motion to Remand. The Court deems this matter appropriate for resolution without oral argument and vacates the hearing set for December 1, 2022. See also C.D. Cal. L.R. 7-15. 24 25 26 / / / / / /

1 Case 2:22-cv-06059-MEMF-AS Document Filed 11/28/ Page 2 of Page ID #:227

I. Background A. Factual Background1 Defendants LBF Travel, Inc. (“LBF Travel”), LBF Travel Management Corp. (“LBF Travel Management”), and Mondee, Inc. (“Mondee”) (collectively referred to as…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.