Yulian Turgelski v. Andres Aramburu

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 2, 20222:22-cv-04469California611 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:22-cv-04469-FMO-MAR Document Filed 12/02/ Page 1 of Page ID #:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 YULIAN TURGELSKI, ) Case No. CV 22-4469 FMO (MARx) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT ) PREJUDICE ANDRES ARAMBURU, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) 16 Plaintiff filed her complaint on June 28, 2022 (Dkt. 1). By order dated October 24, 2022, plaintiff was ordered to show cause, on or before November 1, 2022, why this action should not be dismissed for plaintiff's failure to complete service of the summons and complaint as required by Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (See Dkt. 8, Court’s Order of October 24, 2022). Plaintiff was admonished that “[f]ailure to file a timely response to th[e] Order to Show Cause shall result in the action . . . being dismissed for lack of prosecution and for failure to comply with the orders of the court.” (Id.) (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 & 41(b); Link v. Wabash…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.