Ramzi Daniel v. Robert Allard
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
Case 2:22-cv-07272-ODW-PD Document Filed 12/05/ Page 1 of Page ID #:142
O
2 3 4 5 6
United States District Court Central District of California
11 RAMZI DANIEL, Case № 2:22-cv-07272-ODW (PDx)
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
v.
DISMISS [18]
14 ROBERT ALLARD et al.,
15 Defendants.
16 Presently before the Court is Defendant Robert Allard’s Motion to Dismiss 18 Plaintiff Ramzi Daniel’s Complaint. (Mot. Dismiss (“Motion” or “Mot.”), ECF 19 No. 18.) After carefully considering the papers filed in connection with the Motion, 20 the Court deemed the matter appropriate for decision without oral argument and 21 vacated the December 5, 2022 hearing. Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); C.D. Cal. L.R. 7-15. 22 Because Plaintiff has not filed an opposition, the Court GRANTS the Motion. Central District of California Local Rule 7-9 requires an opposing party to file 24 an opposition to any motion at least twenty-one (21) days prior to the date designated 25 for hearing the motion. Additionally, Local Rule 7-12 provides that “[t]he failure…