Warden

Henry Cordova Lawag v. Warden

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 8, 20222:22-cv-08544California654 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:22-cv-08544-JLS-SK Document Filed 12/08/ Page 1 of Page ID #:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. 2:22-cv-8544-JLS (SK) Date: December 8, 2022 Title Henry C. Lawag v. Warden

Present: The Honorable: Steve Kim, United States Magistrate Judge

Connie Chung n/a Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder

Attorneys Present for Petitioner: Attorneys Present for Respondent:

None present None present

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Petitioner is an inmate at Valley State Prison seeking federal habeas relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for a conviction sustained in a Santa Barbara County Superior Court. (ECF 1 at 1). But his petition is deficient for at least four reasons.

First, Petitioner does not name a respondent. (For clerical processing only, the Clerk’s office used “Warden” as a placeholder respondent.) The proper respondent is whoever has custody over the petitioner, usually the warden of the facility where the petitioner is incarcerated. See Smith v. Idaho, 392…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.