Carmen Angeles v. KIK International LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 9, 20222:22-cv-07342California4,420 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:22-cv-07342-SB-AFM Document Filed 12/09/ Page 1 of Page ID #:673

JS-

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CARMEN ANGELES, Case No. 2:22-cv-07342-SB-AFM Plaintiff, v. ORDER GRANTING

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO

KIK INTERNATIONAL LLC et al., REMAND CASE TO LOS

ANGELES SUPERIOR COURT

Defendants. Plaintiff Carmen Angeles brought this wage and hour case in state court, and Defendant KIK International LLC (KIK) removed it to federal court. Dkt. No. 1. In the notice of removal, KIK asserts that the Court has federal question jurisdiction because Angeles is subject to collective bargaining agreements (CBAs) and therefore § 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act (LMRA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 141–197, completely preempts Angeles’s claims. Id. at 8–13. KIK also claims that the Court has diversity jurisdiction. Id. at 13–24. Angeles moved to remand, Dkt. No. 15, and KIK opposes, Dkt. No. 18. For the following reasons, Angeles’s motion is granted. I. Angeles filed this case in state court as a putative class action. Dkt. No. 1 ¶ 4. Another class action involving similar claims and parties was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.